Tuesday, August 21, 2012

The Catholic Charter Movement




Today, August 21, 2012, the Archdiocese has moved in an unprecedented direction. Archbishop Charles J. Chaput has announced that it will be turning over ALL Philadelphia Archdiocesan High Schools and Special Education Schools to a private management organization known as the Faith in the Future Foundation. Some believe that this is a way for the Archdiocese of Philadelphia to take full advantage of the the new voucher system in Pennsylvania.

I happen to be one of those people. I also happen to be one of those people who is a Catholic school parent and a public school teacher. I am 100% opposed to the voucher system as a Catholic school parent, and I am 100% opposed to the Charter School movement.

Big business is apparently at it again. Any organization that is already making money will make more with the privatization of public entities. In some places, public water systems, public electric, etc. have also been turned over to private enterprises, who have jacked up prices and caused problems for the residents of those areas.

The big question is: Where did the Charter movement begin? Well, that is easy: When politicians sold their campaigns to private management firms. And you better believe that both Democrats and Republicans are guilty to allowing private entities like Goldman Sachs manage their political offices, that at one point in time were managed by the people (remember when the phrase, "government of the people, for the people, by the people" actually meant something - if you do, good! I am too young to have ever seen that).

Everyone from President Barack Obama to Governor Mitt Romney to PA's Governor Tom Corbett, et al have allowed private entities run their offices and campaigns. And what has that led to? A failed economy that will not be able to recover for a long time. The private management of public entities, which is a proven failure. The publicization (turning private entities into publicly funded ones) of Private Schools and failing businesses (with NO strings attached). And so on.

It's time to turn this around. Unfortunately, most people will continue to vote for the two party system. It is also unfortunate that third parties and Independent candidates are not as strong a candidate than anyone in the two party system. So, let's continue to raise taxes on the middle class to pay for the privatization of the public sector and the for the publicization of the private sector, while also cutting taxes for the rich.

Friday, August 12, 2011

We Are Teachers

I am a shadow. I am a reflection. I am a memory. I am a light. I am all of these things because I am a teacher.


I lie awake at night wondering if my lessons are good enough. I wake up the next morning and do a re-write when a new idea pops into my head.


I work 12-14 hour days and weekends and holidays. All without pay. I work during the summer, also without pay. Teaching does not end when the bell rings at the end of the day. It ends when papers are graded, lesson plans are finished, emails are answered or sent after phone calls are made. 


I don't teach for the pay. I teach because I want to make a difference in your life. I care about your well-being and I am there if you need to talk. Teaching used to be a noble profession, but now we are scorned. Blamed. Yelled at.


We have a great health plan because, Lord knows we need it. It's a stressful job, and stress causes illnesses. But we do it for you


You matter! YOU MATTER!


No matter what happens in September, just remember that teachers were left out of every discussion. 


We tried and were ignored. Remember, we very rarely have creative control over what we do in our classrooms. It is all controlled by THE TEST. 


But that doesn't mean we care. WE DO! WE CARE! We fight every day to give you the best education possible. 


Stand by us. But even if you don't, we will stand by you. We are teachers.

Tuesday, August 9, 2011

The education Blame Game

In many places, teachers receive sole blame for students who fail, but what is the reality?  Are teachers the only ones to blame? Of course not! There is plenty of blame to go around. 

Of course, before we get into the blame game, we need to discuss failure. How do we judge a failing school? Let's start with the idea of standardized tests.  Some people think that students are failures because they fail (in PA) three sections of Math and three sections of Reading. I am not sure what other states use as their measuring sticks, so I will stick with Pennsylvania.

Let me start with how illogical that is for certain schools. Some schools have a high percentage of Special Education and ELL students.  Those students are responsible for taking and becoming proficient in the same exact test that Regular Education students take. There are some exceptions to the rule and some Spec Ed and, I believe, ELL students can take a modified test, but that percentage is very low.

So, in High School, if we have a student come to us with a third grade reading level, which does happen and too often, we are expected to be miracle workers and move that student up from a third grade reading level to at least a 9th grade reading level by 11th grade. Research shows that within one year, most students can only master 2 reading levels. Doing some Math, that student who came in with a 3rd grade reading level would only achieve to a 7th grade reading level by the time they have to take an 11th grade test.

So that is failure number one and it works the same way with Math and ELL students who are not at level.

Failure two is poverty.  Students who live in impoverished neighborhoods are likely to fail because too often, they are working to support their families, miss several days of school for various reasons, or have a hard time concentrating because they are wondering where their next, non-school, lunch is coming from.  

Failure three lies within the parents.  (Now before any parents send me hate mail, yes, I will be praising parents, and yes, I will be blaming teachers.)  There are several parents who are supportive of their students and their success.  They sit down at night and work through homework problems with their students or just encourage their students to do their homework, to study. 

Then there are other parents who are thrust into situations that are not ideal.  Some parents work two or more jobs and are not home to help their students with homework.  Some parents are single parents do not have a high school education themselves, and therefore cannot help, and feel like they cannot even encourage their students to do well.  There are also grandparents who are raising their grandchildren, and some of them no longer have the energy to help their students.  Students who are in foster care are also suffering as they move from home to home. Many foster families are great and actually help the children they bring into their homes, but there are too many who just want that extra check and then are hands off with the children they foster.

Problem four lies in teen pregnancy.  Too many teenagers are having consensual sex before graduating high school, and a large number of those sexually active are not having protected sex and getting pregnant.  I have had students come to me in ninth grade that have already had at least (yes AT LEAST) one child.  Having children at such a young age is not easy.  I have known a few students who can balance school and having a child, but that is rare. There are programs out there that help teen parents, but it is a very steep climb even with extra help.

Problem five lies with teachers.  Teachers are human, and they make mistakes.  Some teachers should not be in the profession or need extra classes in how to manage a classroom or differentiate their lessons. The real blame on teachers should come from not speaking up.  I started joining whatever committees I could very early in my career, which now spans eight years.  Through these committees, I tried to refocus what reform should look like, but very often, our administrators' hands were tied by those above them.

There are also those teachers who join the profession to get their student loans paid off.  They sign a contract, teach for for two or three years and leave.  Yes, I point the finger at TFA. Now, don't get me wrong. Some of these TFA teachers are excellent teachers, and some of them stay and teach instead of going into the private sector.  However, those teachers that do not stay on are hurting students. Students sometimes connect with these young teachers and when the teachers leave, the students feel like the teacher was only there for one reason and that is for themselves and not the students.

Problem six lies within the funding.  Funding is not equal everywhere, and yet every school is expected to each 100% proficiency within a random timeline (2014).  This means that students who need certain extra services just do not get them.  Money is scarce and therefore tutoring is not available. Money is scarce, so teachers get laid off in large numbers and classroom size explodes.  Money is scarce and Early Childhood programs are cut, and students do not receive the proper start to their education.

Problem seven deals with reform and reformers.  If reformers do not include educators in the reform conversation, then they are not reforming education. They are spending money on what seems to be sociological research instead of actually wanting to help students.  "What would happen if we created small schools?" "What would happen if we privatize (Charter schools) public schools?" "What would happen if we used public money to send students to private religious schools?"

versa.  We are not addressing how to deal with education here. We are addressing how we can be like other countries. Remind me, why does that matter? Is our country not a first rate country?  Is our economy not one of the strongest in the world? 

The final problem that I address is the students themselves.  Just like anywhere is society, there are some students who have no intrinsic motivation to do well.  They look at standardized tests and they say to themselves, "This test will not prevent me from graduating from High School.  This test will not prevent me from getting into college or getting the job I want. So, why does it matter if I do well?  So what that my school might be turned into a Charter School. I won't be here when it changes over."

So, Mr. Arne Duncan, Mr. President, members of Congress, and so called Education Reformers, before you blame the teachers, let's dissect every issue.  Merit Pay will not work if eight other problems exist.  Charter Schools will not work if eight other problems exist.

Let's look at REAL REFORM by addressing ALL nine issues, not just attacking the teachers.  Let's look at REAL REFORM instead of bullying your greatest ally in the helping students. 

Saturday, August 6, 2011

The Dirty Words: Academic Tracking and Gender Separation

Academic Tracking? Dare I bring this topic to the forefront? Dare I go against the grain?

Yes!

When I was in High School (Dear ole Northeast Catholic High School), we were tracked by ability level.  For me, I felt this was the best way for me to learn.  I needed to be challenged, and so, first track/AP was the best option for me.

I knew many students who were in second and third tracks, who were excelling because they were getting the attention they needed.

In my almost decade of teaching, I see the high ability students struggling.  They're not struggling with grasping the material, but they are struggling with staying on task. They're bored.

The "average" students are also struggling, but not as much as the high ability or high needs students.  Most of the curriculum is geared towards the middle, so that we can reach the greatest number of students.

Some of the high needs students are not thriving because their math or reading levels are too low.  These students should be placed in small focus groups (no more than 10 students in a class) with one Special Education teacher and at least one Special Education Aide.  Once these students are brought to grade level, then we can retest them and place them in the correct track.

Finally, we have ELL students. In my school, they are doing well, but from what I hear from others, they are struggling. ELL students need their own track and once they are ready to move on, then they can be placed in the correct track.

I would also argue for the separation of the male students and female students. Again, my High School was an all-boys school.  We thrived without distractions, and did the girls at our sister school, Little Flower.

Many of the young men that I have taught, are more worried about flirting and hanging out with young ladies than on their academics.  I see the same in reverse.  Young ladies are also distracted by the young men in the schools.

Sure, some young men and ladies can do will in co-ed settings, but the trend I am seeing and from the research being done now, shows that "Gender Segregation" is more advantageous than the co-ed setting.

I will leave this open for discussion. What are your opinions on these two topics?

Please, share this on Twitter, Facebook, and Google Plus!

Philly Files 8.6.11

Happy Saturday to all!

I am introducing this today so that all Philadelphia educators know what the big education stories are in Philadelphia for the day or week.

Thank you for following!

Article by John Thompson

From the article titled, "Why Test-Driven Accountability Is Grasping at Straws"

The Brookings report explained the damage caused by those errors, concluding that test-driven accountability could make teachers behave like dogs who were trained by electrical shocks. When the tests changed, dogs just laid there and waited for the pain to stop. The report then warned of similar "perverse incentives that may actually harm rather than help."